The Contrasting Groups Method is a common approach to setting a cutscore. It is very easy to do, but has the important drawback that some sort of “gold standard” is needed to assign examinees into categories such as Pass and Fail. This “gold standard” should be unrelated to the test itself.
For example, suppose you wanted to set a cutscore on a practice test that is helping examinees determine if they are ready for a high-stakes certification test. You might have past data for examinees who took both your practice exam and the actual certification test. Their results from the certification test can be used to assign them to groups of Pass or Fail, and then you can evaluate the practice test score distributions for each group. These distributions are typically smoothed, and their intersection represents an appropriate cutscore for the practice test. In the example below, the two curves intersect near a score of 85, suggesting that this is an appropriate cutscore for the practice test that will closely predict the results of the official certification test.
I developed a simple tool in MS Excel that allows our psychometricians to easily produce both the smoothed and unsmoothed versions of this method, given nothing more than a list of practice test scores and “real” test classification for examinees. If you think this method might be appropriate for your exams, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org and one of our consultants will get in touch with you.
Want to improve the quality of your assessments?
Sign up for our newsletter and hear about our free tools, product updates, and blog posts first! Don’t worry, we would never sell your email address, and we promise not to spam you with too many emails.
Latest posts by Nathan Thompson, PhD (see all)
- What is the two parameter IRT model (2PL)? - November 28, 2018
- What is the three parameter IRT model (3PL)? - November 28, 2018
- What is the classical item facility statistic in psychometrics? - October 28, 2018